On Monday 03 March 2008 11:59:54 you wrote: > hathe at sidux.com schrieb: > > (...) > > >> Your PC needs to be in the same subnet to connect to the device. > >> > >>> iface lan0 inet static > >>> address 192.168.111.187 > >>> broadcast 192.168.111.191 > >>> netmask 255.255.255.192 > >>> network 192.168.111.128 > >> > >> No, it's incorrect - there's no such device as lan0 in Linux. Why did > >> you change it? > > > > Is it wrong only cause I'm using a different device name? lan0 is my > > first ethernet device. So are the settings correct? > > How do you know lan0 is your ethernet name if you can't connect to it? > Unless you did some tricks with udev, your network interfaces will have > ethX names. lan0 is the ethernet device on my local pc here, and yes I changed /etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules This device works fine in my local net using dhcp or static ip, I just want to know if the configuration above fits the 192.168.111.188/255.255.255.192 network. With "device" in subject I meant my fsg-3, I cannot connect to the fsg-3 device after flashing. > > Or you did connect using a USB-serial cable? If yes, what's the output > of "ifconfig -a" - could you paste it here? > > > (...) > > >>> I don't have a local serial port anymore, I use a USB-Serial adapter, > >>> is it possible to connect two of those to establish a serial link? > >>> (would be FSG-USB->usb-serial adapter->usb-serial adapter->local usb > >>> port) > >> > >> It's enough to have one of those (USB-port in FSG - USB-serial cable - > >> serial port in PC). > > > > As I said I don't have a serial port anymore and I already use such a > > USB-serial cable for my desktop. > > Sorry, I don't understand your question then. > If you're already using your USB-serial cable, why do you ask if you can > use it? Cause I'd need two of them, one connected to the fsg, one to my local pc and I don't know if its possile to connect two of those adapters. |