[sheepdog-users] is --nohalt dangerous?
Liu Yuan
namei.unix at gmail.com
Thu Jul 19 08:14:46 CEST 2012
On 07/19/2012 01:59 PM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> Quorum does not solve all problem, but most of them.
Probably we could extend binary nohalt state into triangle:
1) safe mode: halt cluster when nr_nodes < nr_zones (default)
2) relax mode: halt cluster when nr_nodes < nr_zones / 2 + 1
3) unsafe mode: never halt the cluster.
I am okay to see a patch to change nohalt flag into a switch to control
which mode to run.
Thanks,
Yuan
More information about the sheepdog-users
mailing list