[sheepdog-users] Sheepdog 0.6.0 schedule and todos
Alexandre DERUMIER
aderumier at odiso.com
Tue Nov 6 09:38:08 CET 2012
>>I got 80x times faster even with another HDD as journal device on my test.
Seem great :)
>>See more info at
>>http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/sheepdog/2012-November/007136.html
>> Total write throughput: 33875968.0B/s (32.3M/s), IOPS 8270.5/s.
How many sas drives ?
----- Mail original -----
De: "Liu Yuan" <namei.unix at gmail.com>
À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com>
Cc: "MORITA Kazutaka" <morita.kazutaka at gmail.com>, sheepdog at lists.wpkg.org, sheepdog-users at lists.wpkg.org
Envoyé: Mardi 6 Novembre 2012 09:32:06
Objet: Re: [sheepdog-users] Sheepdog 0.6.0 schedule and todos
On 11/06/2012 04:10 PM, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
> One thing that could be great with journal, is something like slog
> device with zfs or nvram with netapp san.
>
Currently I am writing it. To be honest, I have no idea of zfs and
netapp san.
The idea is that we log ahead all the updates of object in another
device (be it a HHD or SSD or nvram) sequentially and use buffered
IO/direct IO for actual data updates without 'O_DSYNC' flag.
I got 80x times faster even with another HDD as journal device on my test.
See more info at
http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/sheepdog/2012-November/007136.html
> random writes are going to a fast journal (ssd, nvram,...) then are
> flushed sequentially each X seconds to slower disks.
>
The log write will currently is with O_DSYNC | O_DIRECT flag to assure
data integrity. I will consider group commit to accelerate log write
later when basic function is stable.
Thanks,
Yuan
More information about the sheepdog-users
mailing list