[sheepdog-users] Time to get a node info or md info
Liu Yuan
namei.unix at gmail.com
Sat Aug 10 06:34:05 CEST 2013
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:32:34PM +0200, Valerio Pachera wrote:
> 2013/8/9 Liu Yuan <namei.unix at gmail.com>:
> > The long wait time doesn't attribute to how sheepdog get the disk usage, but how
> > busy sheep daemon is. In the recovery, sheep main loop is saturated by recovery
> > requests and the 'md info' get kind of starved.
>
> Ok, clear.
> During recovery sheep was using no more than 20% of cpu and disks are
> busy between 30% and 60% (on the weak server).
> With no recovery and no guests running, it takes 30 seconds.
>
> root at sheepdog001:~# collie node recovery
> Nodes In Recovery:
> Id Host:Port V-Nodes Zone Progress
>
> root at sheepdog001:~# time collie node md info --all
> Id Size Used Avail Use% Path
> Node 0:
> 0 166 GB 154 GB 12 GB 92% /mnt/sheep/dsk01/obj
> 1 465 GB 319 GB 147 GB 68% /mnt/sheep/dsk02
> 2 1.8 TB 1.1 TB 716 GB 61% /mnt/sheep/dsk03
> Node 1:
> 0 166 GB 84 GB 82 GB 50% /mnt/sheep/dsk01/obj
> 1 465 GB 299 GB 166 GB 64% /mnt/sheep/dsk02
> 2 1.8 TB 1.2 TB 667 GB 64% /mnt/sheep/dsk03
> Node 2:
> 0 2.7 TB 1.9 TB 873 GB 68% /mnt/sheep/dsk02
> Node 3:
> 0 465 GB 215 GB 250 GB 46% /mnt/sheep/dsk03
> 1 1.8 TB 1.4 TB 449 GB 75% /mnt/sheep/dsk04
>
> real 0m30.504s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.012s
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong but md info is calculated one after the other,
> not in parallel right?
No, not in parallel as you guessed. Collie's performance will be enhanced in
the later version.
Thanks
Yuan
More information about the sheepdog-users
mailing list