[sheepdog-users] 答复: sheepdog R/W speed from remote Server is very bad than loacal access

[Andrew J. Hobbs]

Copy 1 on a single server, you are gaining none of the functional/performance benefits of sheepdog with that but picking up overhead.  It's a corner case as far as a system like sheepdog is meant to address, performance is very likely broken in that case.  You would do better to run nfs, or some other solution.

On 08/29/2014 05:48 AM, redtone wrote:
Copy = 1

Write speed is 25M, read speed is 30M

________________________________
发件人: sheepdog-users [mailto:sheepdog-users-bounces at lists.wpkg.org] 代表 Valerio Pachera
发送时间: 2014年8月29日 3:30
收件人: Lista sheepdog user
主题: Re: [sheepdog-users] sheepdog R/W speed from remote Server is very bad than loacal access



2014-08-28 16:03 GMT+02:00 redtone <kelphon at redtone.hk<mailto:kelphon at redtone.hk>>:
When I run VM on server A. the virtual disk read speed is 450M and the write
speed is 150M When I run VM on server B. the virtual disk read speed is 30M

Is copy = 3 ?
In such case write speed it right to be ~ 30MB/s because it's 1Gbit/3.
Read speed should be higher, near 1Gbit/s so 100-120M/s.
How do you test read and write speed?



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ajhobbs.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 353 bytes
Desc: ajhobbs.vcf
URL: <http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/sheepdog-users/attachments/20140829/5e878775/attachment-0005.vcf>