[sheepdog-users] SIGABRT when doing: dog vdi check

Marcin Mirosław marcin at mejor.pl
Tue Jan 7 11:14:09 CET 2014


W dniu 07.01.2014 11:05, Liu Yuan pisze:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 10:51:18AM +0100, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
>> W dniu 07.01.2014 03:00, Liu Yuan pisze:
>>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 05:38:41PM +0100, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
>>>> W dniu 2014-01-06 08:27, Liu Yuan pisze:
>>>>> On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 04:13:27PM +0100, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
>>>>>> W dniu 2014-01-04 06:28, Liu Yuan pisze:
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 10:51:26PM +0100, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm new on "sheep-run";) I'm starting to try sheepdog so probably
>>>>>>>> I'm doing many things wrongly. I'm playing with sheepdog-0.7.6.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> First problem (SIGABRT): I started multi sheep daemeon on
>>>>>>>> localhost: # for x in 0 1 2 3 4; do sheep -c local -j size=128M
>>>>>>>> -p 700$x /mnt/sheep/metadata/$x,/mnt/sheep/storage/$x; done
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Next: # dog cluster info Cluster status: Waiting for cluster to
>>>>>>>> be formatted
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> # dog cluster format -c 2:1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 0.7.6 doesn't support erasure code. Try latest master branch
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now I'm on 486ace8ccbb [master]. How I should check choosen redundancy?
>>>>>>  # cat /mnt/test/vdi/list
>>>>>>    Name        Id    Size    Used  Shared    Creation time   VDI id
>>>>>> Copies  Tag
>>>>>>    testowy      0  1.0 GB  0.0 MB  0.0 MB 2014-01-04 15:07   cac836     3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here I can see 3 copies, can't see info about how many parity strips
>>>>>> is configured. Probably this isn't implemented yet?
>>>>>
>>>>> Not yet. But currently you can 'dog cluster info -s' to see the global policy
>>>>> scheme x:y (that you 'dog cluster format -c x:y').
>>>>>
>>>>> With erasure coding, 'copies' will have another meaning that the number of total
>>>>> data + parity objects. In your case, it is 2+1=3. But as you said, this is
>>>>> confusing, I think of adding a extra field to indicate redundancy scheme per vid.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, for about issue, I can't reproduce it. Could you give me more envronment
>>>>> information such as 32 or 64 bits of your OS? what is your distro?
>>>>
>>>> Hi!
>>>> I'm using Gentoo 64bits, gcc version 4.7.3 (Gentoo Hardened 4.7.3-r1
>>>> p1.4, pie-0.5.5), kernel 3.10 with Gentoo patches.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Does the problem still exist? I can't reproduce the issue yet. So how did you
>>> reproduce it step by step?
>>
>> Hi!
>> I'm installing sheepdog-0.7.x, next:
>> # mkdir -p /mnt/sheep/{metadata,storage}
>> # for x in 0 1 2 3 4; do sheep -c local -j size=128M -p 700$x
>> /mnt/sheep/metadata/$x,/mnt/sheep/storage/$x; done
>> # dog cluster format -c 2
>> using backend plain store
>> # dog vdi create testowy 5G
>> # dog  vdi check testowy
>> PANIC: can't find next new idx
>> dog exits unexpectedly (Aborted).
>> dog() [0x4058da]
>> [...]
>>
>> I'm getting SIGABRT on every try.
>>
>>
> 
> On the same machine, with master branch(not stable-0.7), you mentioned you can't
> reproduce the problem?

With master branch (commit  a79e69f9ad9c5) I'm getting such message:
# dog  vdi check testowy
PANIC: can't find a valid vnode
dog exits unexpectedly (Aborted).
dog() [0x4057fa]
/lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0xfd8f) [0x7f6d43cd0d8f]
/lib64/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x38) [0x7f6d43951368]
/lib64/libc.so.6(abort+0x147) [0x7f6d439526c7]
dog() [0x40336e]
dog() [0x409d9f]
dog() [0x40cea5]
dog() [0x403927]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4) [0x7f6d4393dc04]
dog() [0x403c6c]

Will be full gdb backtrace usefull?

Marcin




More information about the sheepdog-users mailing list