[sheepdog-users] Multiple storage clusters per node
Walid Moghrabi
walid.moghrabi at lezard-visuel.com
Tue Mar 4 17:34:40 CET 2014
Thanks for your answer but :
> It depends on corosync or zookeeper, which act as a membership manamgent software
> for sheepdog.
> For corosync, you have 1:1 map of corosync to sheep daemon. So you have to setup
> 2 corosync for two cluster on each node.
> For zookeeper, one zk cluster manages a sheepdog cluster. So you have to setup
> 2 zk clusters to manage different sheepdog clusters.
I tried to install Zookeeper because it would be easier for me than 2 corosync instance (especially because corosync is used and setup by ProxMox and I don't want to play with its setup without extreme caution) but ... the Sheepdog package that is shipped with ProxMox doesn't support Zookeeper as cluster driver as you can see :(
Starting Sheepdog Server : sheepdog-slowInvalid cluster driver 'zookeeper:10.99.0.240:2181'
Supported drivers: corosync local
failed!
I'm doomed ...
Do you have any example of setup with 2 corosync instance on the same node ?
Regards
----- Mail original -----
De: "Liu Yuan" <namei.unix at gmail.com>
À: "Walid Moghrabi" <walid.moghrabi at lezard-visuel.com>
Cc: sheepdog-users at lists.wpkg.org
Envoyé: Mardi 4 Mars 2014 16:44:00
Objet: Re: [sheepdog-users] Multiple storage clusters per node
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 04:35:15PM +0100, Walid Moghrabi wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
> I'm definitely found of Sheepdog, this is great and this is exactly what I need and it works extremely well with ProxMox.
> I experimented a lot with a ProxMox cluster running Sheepdog 0.8 and qemu 1.7 in our lab and it is really impressive.
>
Welcome to become a sheepdog walker :)
>
> Now, we would like to deploy this solution to replace our beta environment on a brand new 3 nodes ProxMox cluster running on dedicated servers at OVH (a french hosting company).
>
>
> These nodes are identical and using this local storage layout :
>
>
> Hardware RAID with LSI Logic MegaRAID controler with 1GB BBU onboard memory.
> On this controler are defines 2 RAID volumes :
> * one RAID1 volume with 2x3TB SATA III mechanical hard drives
> * one RAID0 volume with 2x300GB SATA III Intel S3500 SSD drives
>
>
> Our will is to create 2 Sheepdog storage clusters on these nodes :
> * one "small but fast" using only SSD drives
> * one "big but slow" using only mechanical SATA drives
>
>
> We don't want to mix storage types to make on big sheepdog storage, we really want separated servers.
>
>
> I tried different settings but I can't do that, I always end with one mixed storage even if I run 2 different sheepdog servers binded on different ports or IPs and using different rootdirs, pids, ...
>
>
> Whatever I try, I'm stuck with one volume only.
>
>
> So here are my questions :
>
>
> * Is it possible to have multiple storage instances per nodes ?
> * If so, how ?
Sure. In sheepdog, one daemon actually represent a node. You can run however
much daemons per host.
> For now I'm stuck and I really don't know where to go now :(
>
It depends on corosync or zookeeper, which act as a membership manamgent software
for sheepdog.
For corosync, you have 1:1 map of corosync to sheep daemon. So you have to setup
2 corosync for two cluster on each node.
For zookeeper, one zk cluster manages a sheepdog cluster. So you have to setup
2 zk clusters to manage different sheepdog clusters.
For stability, we recommend zookeeper, which proves to be more realiable for long
running sheepdog cluster.
Thanks
Yuan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/sheepdog-users/attachments/20140304/160fd172/attachment-0005.html>
More information about the sheepdog-users
mailing list