[sheepdog-users] Testing snapshot-object-reclaim
Liu Yuan
namei.unix at gmail.com
Wed Mar 12 09:34:26 CET 2014
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:51:20PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Liu Yuan <namei.unix at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:36:29AM +0100, Valerio Pachera wrote:
> >> 2014-03-10 4:01 GMT+01:00 Liu Yuan <namei.unix at gmail.com>:
> >> > Just want to check when remove all the snapshots include base, is all allocated
> >> > space released? This is the bottom line that at least we can reclaim all the
> >> > space.
> >>
> >> dog vdi list
> >> Name Id Size Used Shared Creation time VDI id Copies Tag
> >> test 0 10 GB 72 MB 6.2 GB 2014-03-07 11:35 7c2b2a 2:1
> >>
> >> dog node list
> >> Id Host:Port V-Nodes Zone
> >> 0 192.168.10.4:7000 75 67807424
> >> 1 192.168.10.5:7000 147 84584640
> >> 2 192.168.10.6:7000 162 101361856
> >>
> >> dog node info
> >> Id Size Used Avail Use%
> >> 0 233 GB 5.9 GB 227 GB 2%
> >> 1 452 GB 5.9 GB 446 GB 1%
> >> 2 500 GB 5.9 GB 494 GB 1%
> >> Total 1.2 TB 18 GB 1.1 TB 1%
> >> Total virtual image size 10 GB
> >>
> >> dog vdi delete test
> >>
> >> dog node info
> >> Id Size Used Avail Use%
> >> 0 233 GB 2.3 GB 230 GB 0%
> >> 1 452 GB 2.3 GB 450 GB 0%
> >> 2 500 GB 2.3 GB 497 GB 0%
> >> Total 1.2 TB 6.8 GB 1.2 TB 0%
> >> Total virtual image size 0.0 MB
> >
> > Hi Hitoshi,
> >
> > Seems that this is a fatal problem need to be solved before merge, because
> > from Valerio test, delete all the snapshots and base don't free the space cleanly.
> > any idea?
>
> I'll work on the problem and post next version of the patch set ASAP.
>
It would be nice if you can add a test case for this scenario.
Thanks
Yuan
More information about the sheepdog-users
mailing list