[sheepdog-users] Testing snapshot-object-reclaim

[Liu Yuan]

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 09:27:00PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> At Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:10:23 +0100,
> Valerio Pachera wrote:
> > 
> > [1  <text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)>]
> > 2014-03-14 3:42 GMT+01:00 Hitoshi Mitake <mitake.hitoshi at gmail.com>:
> > 
> > > Thanks a lot for the log. BTW, was the log produced by the node 0? I
> > > want to confirn this point.
> > 
> > No, the log is from node 2.
> > I imported the vdi from node 0 but the guest was running on node 2.
> > 
> > > Can I see an output of "tree <sheepdog dir>" direct after this status?
> > > I want to know what kind of object is consuming disk space.
> > 
> > 
> > It's attached.
> 
> Thanks for your log. BTW, I think your problem is caused by a bug
> which is already in the discard operation. For solving the problem, I
> required to change both of sheepdog and qemu.
> 
> The change of sheepdog side is pushed to our tree:
> https://github.com/sheepdog/sheepdog/tree/snapshot-object-reclaim
> 
> The change of QEMU side is pushed to here:
> https://github.com/sheepdog/qemu/tree/snapshot-object-reclaim
> 
> Could you update both of sheepdog and qemu, then test it again?
> 

Discard? Probably no, discard can only be enabled by virtio-scsi, which is not
widely adopted by ordinary users. 

Valario, how did you start QEMU?

Thanks
Yuan