[sheepdog-users] Is qemu faster than sbd?
Michał Chybowski
michal.chybowski at tiktalik.com
Thu Aug 20 18:50:46 CEST 2015
Hi,
Are You starting Your sheep daemon with --log level=info parameter?
log level is by default set to debug and it uses a lot of sbd-connected
host's HDD space and IOPS for log-writing (both kernel log and sheep log)
Regards
Michał Chybowski
Tiktalik.com
W dniu 20.08.2015 o 18:47, zhanghongzhou pisze:
> Hi experts,
>
> I mounted sbd as ext4 and tested IOPS for 4k rand/seq rw
>
> 32 sheep, 3-replica. Backend is ssd.
>
> The result is much slower than testing on bear ssd.
> randread IOPS: 16732
> randwrite IOPS: 1436
> sequential read throughput: 64MB/s
> sequential write throughput: 6MB/s
>
> I saw some qemu fio test results from COJ2015 presentation, which is
> much better.
>
> Is my sbd performance result solid? Or maybe it's configuration
> difference?
>
> B.R.
> Hongzhou
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/sheepdog-users/attachments/20150820/d8939da7/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the sheepdog-users
mailing list