MORITA Kazutaka <morita.kazutaka at lab.ntt.co.jp> writes: > Thank you for your testing. I've implemented another approach. > Could you try again? Hi Kazutaka. Yes, this one works fine, and survives the deletion of snapshots nicely. > The vdi id can change if we get the snapshot, so there is a problem > that vdi attributes vanish after taking snapshots. This patch uses > the hash value for the vdi attribute object id instead of the vdi id. Am I right in thinking that implementing in this way precludes the future implementation of vdi rename, or do existing assumptions in the design already make this impossible? Best wishes, Chris. |