At Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:04:56 +0800, Liu Yuan wrote: > > On 08/24/2012 01:37 PM, MORITA Kazutaka wrote: > > It is a good idea to refine the farm backend store too, but simple > > store should be added as another driver, I think. The simple driver > > would become a good tutorial to introduce new drivers. > > Okay, I'd suggest use default_xxx as prefix instead of simple_store_xxx, > because 1) more concise 2) won't cause confusion when people read the > farm code. The driver name should be 'default', too? I think we shouldn't use a name 'simple_store' to avoid confusion. > > I'll go to update the farm's io path to use defaul_xxx functions, I > think this simple store implementation can be nicely applied to farm. The update will change the data layout of farm. How about introducing 'farm2'? I guess farm and farm2 can share all files other than farm.c. Thanks, Kazutaka |