At Sun, 23 Dec 2012 22:30:42 +0800, Liu Yuan wrote: > > On 12/23/2012 02:06 AM, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: > > I'll seek other ways like prio_event_loop(). > > If we can't optimize out sorting of events in most cases that doesn't > need sorting at all, I'd suggest keep current event handling for sheep > and use prio_event_loop() keeper. Then we can merge this patch set > without problem. > OK, I'll send the next version which adds event_loop_prio() later. But I'll drop the second patch in the set because sheep is not a user of event_loop_prio(). Thanks, Hitoshi |