On 12/24/2012 02:34 PM, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: > The changes for other functions are required because this patch > changes the type of event handlers. > Ah, I see. > But... I could find that it is possible to implement keeper without > this patch. So please discard this patch for now. If this feature is > seriously required by sheep or keeper, I'd like to refine and post it > again. If later we find prioritized event handling is a must to implement keeper (efficiently), I am okay to accept this patch. Thanks, Yuan |