At Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:31:09 +0800, levin li wrote: > > On 2012年07月26日 11:25, MORITA Kazutaka wrote: > > At Thu, 26 Jul 2012 10:55:00 +0800, > > Liu Yuan wrote: > >> > >> On 07/26/2012 09:49 AM, levin li wrote: > >>> Currently, -W is not always needed even if -w is used, if no -W, it means > >>> the cache will never be reclaimed. > >>> > >>> If we use -w like the way you mentioned, maybe we can not use it like the > >>> following way to specify that no cache will be reclaimed. > >>> > >>> $ sheep -w -d /store > >> > >> maybe we can use -w 0 to indicate that we don't need cache reclaim? > > > > Are there any cases where unlimited object cache is necessary? Even > > if we have a machine with 1 TB RAM, we should specify '-w 1048576' to > > avoid OOM errors, shouldn't we? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Kazutaka > > > > Currently, cached objects are store in disk not in RAM, it's not so easy > to cause OOM. Ah, I see, sorry for confusion. Thanks, Kazutaka |