On 05/07/2012 05:21 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 10:43:55AM +0800, levin wrote: >> I think the deletion_work_list you mentioned is to keep the deletion work >> runs sequentially, we can queue the next work from the list only after the >> previous one finishes. > Given that deletion_wqueue only has one thread it should always be > sequential, right? Yes, currently there's only one thread for deletion work, maybe it was designed to adapt more thread for the need of future, I think this question can be answered by Kazutaka. thanks, levin |