[Sheepdog] [PATCH v4] remove oids from object list cache when deleting a vdi

[levin]

I think the deletion_work_list you mentioned is to keep the deletion work
runs sequentially, we can queue the next work from the list only after the
previous one finishes.

thanks,

levin

On Friday, May 4, 2012, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 10:26:36AM +0800, levin li wrote:
> > Creating a work queue seems a good idea, or maybe we can reuse
> > the current deletion_queue, I'd try this, since it's more
> > acceptable than change the thread model.
>
>
> Btw, why is the current deletion work queue so complicated?  The sheepdog
> workqueues look fiarly similar to the Linux kernel ones where you queue up
> each item individually, but the delete queue keeps an additional list of
> items to be deleted.  What's the reason for that?
>


-- 
levin
basiccoder.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/sheepdog/attachments/20120505/77562d78/attachment-0003.html>