[sheepdog] [PATCH 2/3] tests: add -j option for testing with journaling

Hitoshi Mitake mitake.hitoshi at gmail.com
Wed Apr 10 10:34:25 CEST 2013

At Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:05:54 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 03:51 PM, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > I don't disagree with making journaling as a default feature. But it
> > seems that current journaling needs to be improved and debugged. I
> > believe removing -j option should be done after enough stabilizing.
> This process looks sens to me. I agree journaling need much debugging
> and improvement. So what do you think of 'improvement' to bring to
> journaling before we can apply it as default?

I believe -j option can be removed after passing all tests with -j
option itself. Currently some tests fail with journaling. This
wouldn't take a long time, -j is a temporal thing.


More information about the sheepdog mailing list