[sheepdog] [PATCH 1/2] collie: show progress in an output of node recovery

[Liu Yuan]

On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:52:07AM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> This patch lets collie output recovery progress. Below is an example
> of a new output.
> 
>   Id   Host:Port         V-Nodes       Zone       Progress
>    0   10.68.13.1:7000        64   17646602       56.3%
>    1   10.68.13.2:7000        64   34423818       37.2%
>    2   10.68.13.3:7000        64   51201034       18.1%
>    3   10.68.13.4:7000        64   67978250       68.9%
>    4   10.68.13.5:7000        64   84755466        3.9%
>    5   10.68.13.6:7000        64  101532682       52.6%
>    6   10.68.13.7:7000        64  118309898       77.9%
>    7   10.68.13.8:7000        64  135087114       38.9%
>    8   10.68.13.9:7000        64  151864330        8.7%
>    9   10.68.13.10:7000       64  168641546       97.1%
>   10   10.68.13.11:7000       64  185418762        1.1%
>   11   10.68.13.12:7000       64  202195978       25.6%
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake.hitoshi at lab.ntt.co.jp>
> ---
>  collie/node.c |   22 ++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/collie/node.c b/collie/node.c
> index 0ab665d..3fe5eb9 100644
> --- a/collie/node.c
> +++ b/collie/node.c
> @@ -206,7 +206,8 @@ static int node_recovery(int argc, char **argv)
>  
>  	if (!raw_output) {
>  		printf("Nodes In Recovery:\n");
> -		printf("  Id   Host:Port         V-Nodes       Zone\n");
> +		printf("  Id   Host:Port         V-Nodes       Zone"
> +		       "       Progress\n");
>  	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < sd_nodes_nr; i++) {
> @@ -227,9 +228,22 @@ static int node_recovery(int argc, char **argv)
>  		if (state.in_recovery) {
>  			addr_to_str(host, sizeof(host),
>  					sd_nodes[i].nid.addr, sd_nodes[i].nid.port);
> -			printf(raw_output ? "%d %s %d %d\n" : "%4d   %-20s%5d%11d\n",
> -				   i, host, sd_nodes[i].nr_vnodes,
> -				   sd_nodes[i].zone);
> +			if (raw_output) {
> +				printf("%d %s %d %d %"PRIu64" %"PRIu64"\n", i,
> +				       host, sd_nodes[i].nr_vnodes,
> +				       sd_nodes[i].zone, state.nr_finished,
> +				       state.nr_total);

isn't better to print state.nr_finished/state.nr_total for the last field?
	
> +			} else {
> +				printf("%4d   %-20s%5d%11d", i, host,
> +				       sd_nodes[i].nr_vnodes, sd_nodes[i].zone);
> +
> +				if (state.in_recovery)

This if check isn't necessary.

Thanks
Yuan