[sheepdog] [PATCH v2 1/3] dog: parallelize parse_vdi() with work queue
MORITA Kazutaka
morita.kazutaka at gmail.com
Wed Aug 28 18:07:05 CEST 2013
At Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:35:35 +0900,
Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
>
> Current dog issues request for gathering VDI information in a
> sequential manner (parse_vdi()). This way is not scalable when a
> number of VDIs becomes larger.
>
> This patch parallelize parse_vdi() with work queue. Some dog
> commands which call parse_vdi() can enjoy performance improvement.
>
> The below is an sample of dog vdi list. The test is done on 16
> nodes cluster which has 3000 VDIs.
>
> Before:
> $ time sh -c "dog/dog vdi list -a 10.68.13.1 > /dev/null"
> sh -c "dog/dog vdi list -a 10.68.13.1 > /dev/null" 8.81s user 0.24s system 70% cpu 12.876 total
>
> After:
> % time sh -c "dog/dog vdi list -a 10.68.13.1 > /dev/null"
> sh -c "dog/dog vdi list -a 10.68.13.1 > /dev/null" 14.35s user 2.02s system 209% cpu 7.816 total
user time + system time > total time
Is this really correct?
Thanks,
Kazutaka
More information about the sheepdog
mailing list