[sheepdog] [PATCH v3 0/3] Introducing unittest framework to sheepdog

[Kai Zhang]

I think 'unittest' and 'tests' are good enough.
'functional_teset' looks odd to me.

Anyway, we should consider others' opinions.

Thanks,
Kyle

On Jun 8, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Liu Yuan <namei.unix at gmail.com> wrote:

> I am wondering if we should put unittest in tests/ and put previous
> tests/* into tests/functional_test/*

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/sheepdog/attachments/20130608/bd0794de/attachment-0004.html>