[sheepdog] [PATCH v7 5/6] shepherd: a new cluster manager specialized for sheepdog
Liu Yuan
namei.unix at gmail.com
Mon Mar 11 06:38:51 CET 2013
On 03/11/2013 11:48 AM, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> +static void remove_handler(int fd, int events, void *data)
> +{
> + struct sheep *s;
> + int ret, failed = 0;
> + eventfd_t val;
> + bool election = false;
> +
> + ret = eventfd_read(remove_efd, &val);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + panic("eventfd_read() failed: %m");
> +
> + sd_dprintf("removed sheeps: %lu", val);
> + assert(0 < val);
> +
> +
> +remove:
> + /* FIXME */
FIX what?
> + list_for_each_entry(s, &sheep_list_head, sheep_list) {
> + if (s->state != SHEEP_STATE_LEAVING)
> + continue;
> +
On 03/11/2013 11:48 AM, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:> +static void
(*msg_handlers[])(struct sph_msg*, struct sheep *) = {
> + [SPH_CLI_MSG_JOIN] = msg_join,
> + [SPH_CLI_MSG_NEW_NODE_REPLY] = msg_new_node_reply,
> + [SPH_CLI_MSG_NOTIFY] = msg_notify,
> + [SPH_CLI_MSG_BLOCK] = msg_block,
> + [SPH_CLI_MSG_LEAVE] = msg_leave,
> +};
> +
I'd suggest
+static void (*msg_handlers[])(struct sph_msg*, struct sheep *) = {
+ [SPH_CLI_MSG_JOIN] = sph_handle_join,
+ [SPH_CLI_MSG_NEW_NODE_REPLY] = sph_handle_new_node_reply,
+ [SPH_CLI_MSG_NOTIFY] = sph_handle_notify,
+ [SPH_CLI_MSG_BLOCK] = sph_handle_block,
+ [SPH_CLI_MSG_LEAVE] = sph_handle_leave,
+};
How about NEW_NODE_REPLY -> JOIN_REPLY?
Thanks,
Yuan
More information about the sheepdog
mailing list