On May 30, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Liu Yuan <namei.unix at gmail.com> wrote: > I think this assumption works fine and is not a big fuss. If we use > another scheme to represent sheep, we can reconsider the code. For now, > we should do what is optimal. This makes sense. Please drop this patch, I will resend another one. Thanks, Kyle -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/sheepdog/attachments/20130530/3e986515/attachment.html> |