[sheepdog] [PATCH v5 0/2] dog: repair objects based on majority vote
Hitoshi Mitake
mitake.hitoshi at gmail.com
Tue Nov 12 07:22:27 CET 2013
At Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:09:03 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:45:23AM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > Current object repair strategy of "dog vdi check" doesn't work well if
> > objects are corrupted. The first one adds a test for the case, and the
> > second patch adds a mechanism for majority voting in the command.
> >
> > v5: drop ignore change in v4
>
> Applied after fixing new blank line at EOF for 077
Oops, thanks for your fix.
>
> I'd like to see patche(s) that deal with the case when majority object isn't
> found. What in my head to deal with this is:
>
> - add an option 'depth' for 'dog vdi track' command to get the information of
> targeted object placement.
>
> With this information, people can do a manual copy\overwrite to missing/inconsistent
> objects.
>
I agree. In addition, corrupted or lost inode objects should be
repaired by dog vdi repair. I'll implement them later.
Thanks,
Hitoshi
More information about the sheepdog
mailing list