[sheepdog] some problem about sheepdog
gzh1992n
gzh1992n at gmail.com
Fri Aug 1 07:03:31 CEST 2014
*Hi*
*Recently, I met some problems in learning sheepdog.*
*I have 2 machines. They information follow:*
*Node1[10.198.3.141]*
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FC:48:EF:2E:47:2B
inet addr:10.198.3.141 Bcast:10.198.3.191 Mask:255.255.255.192
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:166041 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:272247 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:81563807 (77.7 MiB) TX bytes:35527000 (33.8 MiB)
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:489642 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:489642 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:54504426 (51.9 MiB) TX bytes:54504426 (51.9 MiB)
*Node2[10.198.4.108]*
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FC:48:EF:2E:69:8B
inet addr:10.198.4.108 Bcast:10.198.4.127 Mask:255.255.255.192
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:113220 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:66017 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:114656591 (109.3 MiB) TX bytes:18070118 (17.2 MiB)
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:77863 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:77863 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:9968948 (9.5 MiB) TX bytes:9968948 (9.5 MiB)
*They are not in the same ethernet switch.The corosync conf follow:*
# Please read the corosync.conf.5 manual page
compatibility: whitetank
totem {
version: 2
secauth: off
threads: 0
interface {
ringnumber: 0
bindnetaddr: 192.168.1.1
mcastaddr: 239.255.1.1
mcastport: 5405
ttl: 1
}
}
logging {
fileline: off
to_stderr: no
to_logfile: yes
to_syslog: yes
logfile: /var/log/cluster/corosync.log
debug: off
timestamp: on
logger_subsys {
subsys: AMF
debug: off
}
}
amf {
mode: disabled
}
*Two confs is same. My issue is that they not in the same cluster.*
*Node1 input *"dog node list"
Id Host:Port V-Nodes Zone
0 127.0.0.1:7000 64 16777343
Node2 input "dog node list"
Id Host:Port V-Nodes Zone
0 127.0.0.1:7000 64 16777343
*Only two nodes in the same **ethernet switch can in the same cluster?*
*help me,please...*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/sheepdog/attachments/20140801/3f26eda3/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the sheepdog
mailing list