[sheepdog] Users inputs for new reclaim algorithm, please
MORITA Kazutaka
morita.kazutaka at gmail.com
Mon Mar 17 23:19:49 CET 2014
At Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:02:18 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
>
> Keep old algorithm is a bottom line to me. Either sheep option or static #ifdef
> looks fine to me. We can later refine it to be dynamically pluggable.
>
> New algorithm looks to me more a partial solution than a generic one, compared
> with old algorithm. So keep old algorithm really make sense especially to those
> who seldom delete snapshots.
Why partial? The updated snapshot-object-reclaim branch fixes the
problem you mentioned, and the new algorithm frees more spaces than
the old one even with your example scenario.
Thanks,
Kazutaka
More information about the sheepdog
mailing list