[sheepdog] Why Sheepdog is talking more CPU ?

[ankit bhardwaj]

I am using QEMU 2.0.0 and Sheepdog daemon version 0.7.5 on Ubuntu 14.04.

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Hitoshi Mitake <mitake.hitoshi at gmail.com>
wrote:

> At Tue, 23 Jun 2015 20:16:05 +0530,
> ankit bhardwaj wrote:
> >
> > [1  <multipart/related (7bit)>]
> > [1.1  <multipart/alternative (7bit)>]
> > [1.1.1  <text/plain; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>]
> > I am using "sheep -n /mnt/sheep/0 -c
> zookeeper:IP1:2181,IP2:2181,IP3:2181"
> > to start sheep on each node. And in the question I was mostly talking
> about
> > reading speed. Writing speed was quite less than the native disk writing.
> >
> > On my machine I am able to run 10 VMs comfortably , within 40 seconds
> when
> > I am using local disk. But when I try to boot these VM in 3 node- 3
> replica
> > sheepdog cluster, CPU becomes the bottleneck after booting 3 VM
> > simultaneously.  Here is the graph for booing 5 VM simultaneously in
> > sheepdog cluster.
>
> Thanks for your detailed report. Could you provide version of sheepdog and
> QEMU?
>
> Thanks,
> Hitoshi
>
> >
> >
> > 鈥>
> > I want to run more number of VMs. Is there anything, that can be done in
> > terms of setup, number of node, Number of replicas etc ?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Hitoshi Mitake <
> mitake.hitoshi at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > At Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:57:53 +0530,
> > > ankit bhardwaj wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [1  <multipart/alternative (7bit)>]
> > > > [1.1  <text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)>]
> > > > I am using 3 node cluster , with 3 copies of disk image. So, each
> node
> > > have
> > > > a full copy of disk image.
> > >
> > > Could you provide an option for your sheep processes?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Hitoshi
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Vasiliy Tolstov <
> v.tolstov at selfip.ru>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > 2015-06-23 1:40 GMT+03:00 ankit bhardwaj <ankitbhrdwj27 at gmail.com
> >:
> > > > > > I am new to Sheepdog. Though I have gained enough knowledge to
> > > deploy and
> > > > > > use sheepdog for qemu-kvm VMs. I tried to benchmark Sheepdog and
> > > found
> > > > > that:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. Sheepdog's Maximum Read/Write Speed is around 70-80% compared
> to
> > > local
> > > > > > storage. That too when the condition are in favour of sheepdog.
> > > Example:
> > > > > > Full copy of data on same node and Reading or writing sequential
> Data
> > > > > etc.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2. When using VM disk image to boot VM from Sheepdog storage,
> some
> > > extra
> > > > > > system activities increase the load on the CPU from 30-40%.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can you please tell me,:
> > > > > > Why the speed is slow, even if all the data is on the same
> machine ?
> > > > > > What activity in sheepdog is eating up my processor cycles ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry for the loosely described experiments and results.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we need command line for running sheepdog and how you
> format
> > > > > you cluster (erasure coded or replicas) ?
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Vasiliy Tolstov,
> > > > > e-mail: v.tolstov at selfip.ru
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Ankit Bhardwaj
> > > > [1.2  <text/html; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>]
> > > >
> > > > [2  <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
> > > > --
> > > > sheepdog mailing list
> > > > sheepdog at lists.wpkg.org
> > > > https://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ankit Bhardwaj
> > [1.1.2  <text/html; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>]
> >
> > [2 Sheepdog_Resource_usage.png <image/png (base64)>]
> >
>



-- 
Ankit Bhardwaj
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/sheepdog/attachments/20150624/eab65b78/attachment-0001.html>