[sheepdog] [PATCH 6/6] sheep: clear bit in vdi_deleted if vdi is created

[Hitoshi Mitake]

At Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:58:08 +0900,
Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> 
> At Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:51:48 +0900,
> Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > 
> > At Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:42:35 +0800,
> > Liu Yuan wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 08:49:34PM +0800, Liu Yuan wrote:
> > > > From: Liu Yuan <liuyuan at cmss.chinamobile.com>
> > > > 
> > > > This patch fixes following problem:
> > > > 
> > > > $ dog vdi create test 100M
> > > > $ dog vdi delete test
> > > > $ dog vdi create test 200M
> > > > $ dog vdi list # expect show test, but nothing shows out.
> > > > 
> > > > Which was brought by
> > > > 
> > > > *commit f68feab7edc0ded86701a2e902d85616b24942ab
> > > > *Author: Saeki Masaki <saeki.masaki at po.ntts.co.jp>
> > > > *Date:   Wed Nov 26 10:50:46 2014 +0900
> > > > 
> > > >     sheep/dog: introduce new bitmap for delete vdi
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: Saeki Masaki <saeki.masaki at po.ntts.co.jp>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Liu Yuan <liuyuan at cmss.chinamobile.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  sheep/ops.c | 7 +++++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/sheep/ops.c b/sheep/ops.c
> > > > index 8a0f77c..464ae0b 100644
> > > > --- a/sheep/ops.c
> > > > +++ b/sheep/ops.c
> > > > @@ -130,11 +130,14 @@ static int post_cluster_new_vdi(const struct sd_req *req, struct sd_rsp *rsp,
> > > >  	unsigned long nr = rsp->vdi.vdi_id;
> > > >  	int ret = rsp->result;
> > > >  
> > > > -	sd_info("req->vdi.base_vdi_id: %x, rsp->vdi.vdi_id: %x", req->vdi.base_vdi_id, rsp->vdi.vdi_id);
> > > > +	sd_info("req->vdi.base_vdi_id: %x, rsp->vdi.vdi_id: %x",
> > > > +		req->vdi.base_vdi_id, rsp->vdi.vdi_id);
> > > >  
> > > >  	sd_debug("done %d %lx", ret, nr);
> > > > -	if (ret == SD_RES_SUCCESS)
> > > > +	if (ret == SD_RES_SUCCESS) {
> > > >  		atomic_set_bit(nr, sys->vdi_inuse);
> > > > +		atomic_clear_bit(nr, sys->vdi_deleted);
> > > > +	}
> > > >  
> > > >  	return ret;
> > > >  }
> > > > -- 
> > > > 1.9.1
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > At least this patch fixes a real problem and should be applied, Hitoshi?
> > > 
> > > Yuan
> > 
> > Applied this one, thanks.
> 
> On the second thought, this problem cannot happen on the current
> master. It is caused by the old invalid recycling. So I'll revert
> it, OK?
> # seems that there's no patches after this one, I'll simply rebase and
> # update forcibly

Removed this one, sorry for confusion.

Thanks,
Hitoshi