On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 12:40 -0500, Mike Christie wrote: > FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori at lab.ntt.co.jp> > > Subject: Re: [Stgt-devel] stgt & IBM virtual SCSI Target Driver > > Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 20:49:06 +0900 > > > > > >>>target driver (queue cmnd alloc buffer) -> protocol (SCSI stuff) -> STGT > >>> > >>>So then the target driver can pass some protocol specifc values like cdb > >>>and lun (and lun decoder if necessary) without the stgt core having to > >>>worry about that stuff. This will also allow you to make it so target > >>>drivers do not have to touch things like the cdb field (I can move that > >>>to a protocol specific cmnd data finally). > >> > >>I agreed. Now we should remove all protocol specific stuff in stgt. I > >>tried to do this (though I'm not sure whether I've done in a right way > >>about some of the changes). > > > > > > By the way, it's time to rename stgt tgt (or something generic), I > > guess. > > yeah, what a pain :) I am fine with tgt. Maybe "blktgt" (that may be too > long) to show we are generic like the block layer. I am not so good at > naming things :) i think tgt is fine here. blktgt is too long. > > > > > I also think about rename IET something generic like istgt or isstgt > > (iSCSI software target). After all, the code will be really very from > > the original IET code. Any suggestions? istgt is better. is(csi) + tgt ming > _______________________________________________ > Stgt-devel mailing list > Stgt-devel at lists.berlios.de > http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/stgt-devel |