From: Ming Zhang <mingz at ele.uri.edu> Subject: Re: [Stgt-devel] stgt & IBM virtual SCSI Target Driver Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:01:31 -0400 > > > > > I also think about rename IET something generic like istgt or isstgt > > > > > (iSCSI software target). After all, the code will be really very from > > > > > the original IET code. Any suggestions? > > > > > > istgt is better. is(csi) + tgt > > > > I'm not sure because we'll support multiple iSCSI target drivers. > > there are mpt, qla. maybe we use IETTGT to indicate it is originated > from iet? This implementation is a new project. It is a fork of IET. I think that calling two different implementations a same name causes unnecessary confusion (e.g. sfnet and open-iscsi). > We already registered IET in T10 as a vendor id. so it is a > formal name. The new project can get it easily if necessary. |