On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 23:36 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > From: Ming Zhang <mingz at ele.uri.edu> > Subject: Re: [Stgt-devel] stgt & IBM virtual SCSI Target Driver > Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 09:39:18 -0400 > > > > > > I'm not sure because we'll support multiple iSCSI target drivers. > > > > > > > > there are mpt, qla. maybe we use IETTGT to indicate it is originated > > > > from iet? > > > > > > This implementation is a new project. It is a fork of IET. I think > > > that calling two different implementations a same name causes > > > unnecessary confusion (e.g. sfnet and open-iscsi). > > > > my understanding is when tgt get matured, IET will be merged here soon. > > iet always wants to have a better layer split and now tgt comes. so iet > > of course will follow this path. i do not think we need to maintain 2 > > open source iscsi software target code. > > It's not about only using the tgt framework. There are many other > issues. > > Hopefully, the tgt framework will be merged into mainline. After that, > I'll rewrite the large portion of IET. The iSCSI target implementation > for tgt will be completely different from IET. ic. so u want to redo it. then it is separated and independent new project. > > If I successfully make the new iSCSI implementation as stable as the > current IET code, I'll stop maintaining IET. at that time, i do not see reasons that why IET should keep alive. :P ming |