Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > Tomasz Chmielewski schrieb: >> Doron Shoham schrieb: >>> modifying a target that already exits in tgt, current instance will >>> be delete >>> and a new one will be created with the new parameters instead. >> >> Hmm, this is not optimal - it offlines, removes and configures each >> target from scratch even if no changes were made. > > Besides, it doesn't even seem to work properly: all targets get the same > tid... > > You are right. I suggest we do something like the delete option: --update <ALL|tid=|targetname> It would only update the target if it is not in use. ALL would update all targets which are not in use - Targets which have initiators connected will not be updated. |