Tomasz Chmielewski, on 04/14/2009 03:07 PM wrote: > Vladislav Bolkhovitin schrieb: > >>> Could anyone recheck if it's the same on some other system? >>> >>>> Which IO scheduler on the target did you use? I guess, deadline? If >>>> so, you should try with CFQ as well. >>> I used CFQ. >> You didn't apply io_context-XXX.patch, correct? With it you should see a >> noticeable increase, like in http://scst.sourceforge.net/vl_res.txt. > > I didn't apply this one. > > I used 2.6.26.x kernel and io_context-XXX.patch was for 2.6.27, 2.6.28 > and 2.6.29 only; 2.6.27 fails to apply to 2.6.26.8 kernel (perhaps in a > trivial way, I didn't check). Yes, io_context patch for 2.6.26.x kernels doesn't exist, because it isn't clear if it has the necessary functionality. But it's worth for you to upgrade to 2.6.27.x. Have you seen http://scst.sourceforge.net/vl_res.txt? Vlad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html |