Hi Daniel, Daniel Dehennin wrote: > I must confess that I'm quite confuse with the SVN repository: > - the current-development branch does not exists any more, > - the stable branch is not a tag of a particular revision of the > current-development branch. We are using SVN and not CVS. In CVS it's normal to use tags and branch-tags. In SVN revisions can be moved (moves are versioned as well). So the current-development branch still exists but is currently empty. The code previously under current-development has moved to the stable/1.1/ directory now as it became stable. As always only the latest version of a brancht/tree is managed I don't see a reason yet to use tags to mark revisions. The latest one is to be used. So I am most probably going to check in the first 1.2 testing release into current-development/1.2 and when it's going to be released it's moved to the stable/ tree. Probably you're used to CVS versioning where moving is uncommon (means a re-checkin) but rather tagging and branch-tagging is usual. In SVN moving the files to directories is similar to branch-tagging in CVS. br, Rainer |