Andre Ilie wrote: > Hi > > Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: >> For some reason, we got a checkVal, not defined anywhere in 0.9.8-test2. >> And the reason is: lack of proper testing (well, that's why we have >> all -test releases, right). >> >> So, the next thing I do, will be a basic set of packages/profiles xml >> files + some "artificial" installers (batch files creating new files >> and perhaps registry entries - for "check" conditions). > > Please do it, as we really need the core features to work. All right, there is a quick, proof-of-concept wpkg-debug package available for download at http://www1.wpkg.org/files/wpkg/wpkg-debug.tar.bz2 It's really basic, and doesn't test all features, but this is how I imagine this could work? > Also I > think a version control system would be also nice, to easily roll-back > broken patches. And than you could also maintain a public repository for > the people developing wpkg, thus having fewer merging work. Is svn.wpkg.org alive? Jerry? -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org _______________________________________________ wpkg-users mailing list wpkg-users at lists.wpkg.org http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkg-users |