Jerry Haltom wrote: > When I first put together wpkg, I had a need for this. However, after > about 10 minutes of thought I realized this was just the wrong place for > it. There are tools out there, right now, commercial and free, for > aggregating windows NT event logs. There is ntsyslog, which forwards all > event logs to a syslog server. There's a lot of really nice commercial > ones. > > These have other benefits, such as seeing more than wpkg. Wpkg, imo, > should use the Windows-sanctified logging mechanism, and the event log > API is it. As I can recall, one of the latest Samba releases has a tool for checking event logs? But maybe I'm confusing with something else. Anyway, this server side logging (>>\\server\logs\machine.log) has certainly one advantage: (WPKG) logs are always available, even if the workstations are off, without setting anything additional on workstations. -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org _______________________________________________ wpkg-users mailing list wpkg-users at lists.wpkg.org http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkg-users |