hello to my understanding,dependecies are not made to define an install order, but to define that a package is mandatory for another package to be installed... e.g. firefox has to be installed if we want to install flash player. If you want to define an order for installing, use priorities instead. ELH Jens Geile a écrit : > Hi, > > I've just done a few tests messing with package dependencies and found an error in the dependency chain handling. > > This is how my dependencies chain looks like: > > "QuickTime Alternative" depends on "Real Alternative" > "Real Alternative" depends on "PuTTY" > "PuTTY" depends on "Codec Pack" > "Codec Pack" depends on "Firefox" > "Firefox" depends on "IrfanView" > > Now i add "QuickTime Alternative" to the profile and restart the machine. An this is how WPKG installs the packages: > 1. "Real Alternative" > 2. "PuTTY" > 3. "Codec Pack" > 4. "Firefox" > 5. "IrfanView" > 6. "QuickTime Alternative" > > This is somehow not the way I'd expect the dependencies to work. I'd expect to see it work like this: > > 1. "IrfanView" > 2. "Firefox" > 3. "Codec Pack" > 4. "PuTTY" > 5. "Real Alternative" > 6. "QuickTime Alternative" > > Thoughts? > > - > jens > wpkg-users mailing list wpkg-users at lists.wpkg.org http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkg-users |