Brian May schrieb: >>>>>> "Tomasz" == Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo at wpkg.org> writes: > > Tomasz> Well, perhaps it suffices if WPKG service is started as a > Tomasz> domain user, or WPKG path uses domain user credentials. > > Tomasz> Then, Windows should take care of all security issues for > Tomasz> us - no need to reinvent anything here, if the operating > Tomasz> system already does it? > > Tomasz> And Brian - what kind of tests did you really make? > > Unfortunately not. > > I setup a Samba server, not in a domain, and configured to map any bad > password to the guest user, with the same name as a server that was in > the domain. > > The client computer was a domain member and logged into the domain. > > I ensured that the genuine server was off-line, and from the client > computer, I established a connection to the fraudulent server. > > Windows did not offer any errors or warnings that the computer I was > connecting to was fraudulent or that it was connecting as a guest user > instead of the (expected) authenticated user. Well, so it's your setup's fault - mapping bad users/passwords is not a recommended habit... Would the same scenario work if you didn't map bad user/password to guest? -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org wpkg-users mailing list wpkg-users at lists.wpkg.org http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkg-users |