[wpkg-users] FW: 1.0?

[Tomasz Chmielewski]

Rainer Meier schrieb:
>> Really, someone was talking about any January deadline? If so, you 
>> sure 2008 was mentioned? ;)
> 
> Yes, we discussed about the January deadline. 1.0 RC7 is quite stable 
> from my point of view.
> 
> 
>> Hmm, finger in the air - Rainer, do you think rc7 can be released as 
>> 1.0, or does it still need some code added here and there?
> 
> As I wrote to some of you (yes, my mailinglist subscription was broken, 
> hope it works now) I intended to fix Bug 97 (see 
> <http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97>) and Bug 98 (see 
> <http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98>) I wanted to wait until I 
> can analyze this reports.
> 
> Well it turned out that both of them are not really WPKG bugs. One was a 
> misbehaving user package and the other one simply misconfiguration.
> 
> Finally I don't see any critical bugs left on WPKG 1.0 RC7. As it has 
> been around for quite a long time already I would recommend to release it.
> 
> I propose to release it as 1.0.0. After release we will only fix 
> critical bugs in 1.0.x releases. New feature request and trials go to 
> the already existing 1.1.x Mx branch (I think I have to look for a 
> versioning system as WPKG does not seem to use an official one).
> 
> So let's release it.

What about these two posted by Frank?

http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104 - 'Adds an opening quote to 
"Adding settings node" - Utterly trivial patch' - I have no objections.

http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103 - 'Handling absence of 
config.xml' says:

      By default, wpkg.js exits silently without any info
      if the config.xml file isn't found

Last time I tried, wpkg.js did work without config.xml - am I misreading 
anything?


-- 
Tomasz Chmielewski