http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117 --- Comment #5 from Dave Ewart <davee at ceu.ox.ac.uk> 2008-05-09 15:54:24 --- > Frank thinks he's using neither of these definitions, actually (-: :-) > My point is that I feel WPKG ought not to re-order the priority of the packages > based on dependencies. So you suggest that if one package has an actual *hard* dependency (i.e. simply won't install or run without $OTHER_PACKAGE), then that should be handled by the WPKG administrator by setting different *priorities* instead? I guess this is a matter of terminology: the use of "dependency" in the WPKG framework is actually rather more like "includes", then, I suppose. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. |