I also started out running a similar system, I have run windows setup originally using unattend, but fell back to using a ghost image + wpkg. Even when automated, the clients took 3-4 hours to install. I now roll-up my current WPKG SOE 1 or 2 times a year into a new ghost image. This brings total installation time to between 15min-45min for a desktop, 2-3hours laptop (They're Encrypted). In fact I just reached 200 managed packages today after 12 months of using WPKG. For an organisation with 300 users we have ALOT of software, something in the order of 400 different active titles. The biggest difficulty is re-packaging, Appdeploy.com helps alot. -- Michael Chinn User Support Officer - Information Technology Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority PO Box 1379 TOWNSVILLE, QLD 4810 Ph 07 47500874 Fax 07 4772 6093 michaelc at gbrmpa.gov.au ================================================================================ If you have received this transmission in error please notify us immediately by return email and delete all copies. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or distribution of this email is prohibited. ================================================================================ Kevin Landers wrote, On 17/10/2008 10:20: > > > Hi Berge, > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 6:02 AM, Berge Schwebs Bjørlo > <berge at trivini.no <mailto:berge at trivini.no>> wrote: > > FWIW, we use a method similar to Rainer Meier's method, but > started in a > different way. We've made a (rather hackish, but effective) unattended > Windows installation suite (which boots Linux off PXE, mounts an > installation > share, partitions disks and run Windows Setup in dosemu). Windows > Setup is > fed with a file called unattend.txt - among other things, it > installs WPKG > > > > > I can give you the details if you're interested. > > > I would be very interested in hearing your methods for such an > installation process. I have long thought it to make sense to perform > such roll outs via a PXE boot. I would have never thought to utilize > dosemu in that way though. Any and all insight you could provide about > this would be greatly appreciated. Perhaps if you are willing, we > could move such information to the wiki, etc. *Believes heavily in > documentation* ;) > > Thanks, > > landersk > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > wpkg-users mailing list archives >> http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/ > _______________________________________________ > wpkg-users mailing list > wpkg-users at lists.wpkg.org > http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkg-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/attachments/20081017/f6b244ae/attachment.html> |