[wpkg-users] WPKG - possibly stupid questions

Adam Williams awilliam at mdah.state.ms.us
Sat Mar 14 04:38:47 CET 2009


for option 3, the cscript dos client can only connect to file shares as 
the guest account.  also cscript doesn't exist on XP/Vista 64-bit, you 
have to use the GUI client.  the GUI client comes as an .msi you should 
be able to push out via group policy.

Peter Gough wrote:
> I'm trying to get my head around the best way to implement WPKG in our 
> environment but am struggling to work out the most appropriate 
> options. We're running Windows Server 2003 with Active Directory and 
> Windows XP SP3 on workstations.
>
> I have created a share, granted read-only permissions to my 
> 'wpkg-user' account, copied the server files into it, created some 
> subfolders for my packages and updated the hosts.xml, packages.xml and 
> profiles.xml files as described in the wiki.
>
> I have also installed wpkg-client on a single workstation, configured 
> it to point to this share and exported my settings.xml file to the 
> same share as the other server files.
>
> As I understand it I can now do the following:
>
> 1, push the client application to my workstations using psexec. If I 
> do this then the workstations would run the wpkg service, access the 
> share, check their status against the hosts.xml file to see if they 
> are in any profile groups and would then install packages as required. 
> Once each client connects (at startup?) they would write a local 
> wpkg.xml file to %system%\system32.
>
> 2, as above but use Group Policy to deliver the client to 
> workstations, however I can't work out how to apply the install 
> switches as described in the documentation. I've tried using GP to run 
> a script with the full command line but when I try to do this I get an 
> error that the package is invalid.
>
> 3, use a GP script to run *'cscript \\server\path\to\WPKG\wpkg.js 
> /synchronize /quiet /nonotify' *or the wpkg-start.bat file at startup. 
> Doing this would mean that I don't need to install the client but the 
> downside is that I don't seem to get any wpkg dialog boxes when 
> Windows starts - all the user sees is the generic 'running startup 
> scripts' message from GP and given that some of the installs take a 
> while this might lead some users to restart their machines thinking 
> they have hung. I also can't get this to work unless I give 
> 'authenticated users' permissions to read the shared folders which 
> means that there doesn't seem to be any benefit to setting up the 
> wpkg-user account.
>
> Can somebody who has done this let me know what the benefits would be 
> in using the client install over option 3. If there are some tangible 
> benefits then can you let me know if it is possible to install the 
> client using GP. If option 3 is preferred for my environment then can 
> somebody point me towards how I might go about solving my missing 
> dialog box issue and whether there are any other issues I need to 
> think about prior to implementation.
>
> Many thanks in advance,
>
> Pete
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> wpkg-users mailing list archives >> http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/
> _______________________________________________
> wpkg-users mailing list
> wpkg-users at lists.wpkg.org
> http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkg-users
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/attachments/20090313/0d3a3dda/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the wpkg-users mailing list