>
> Note that I think your initial proposal would not work as the
> finally block is
> never reached if return is used from within the
> timeout-detection loop:
>
> if (count >= timeout) {
> return -1;
> }
>
>
> So I've changed it to use exception handling:
>
> if (count >= timeout) {
> throw new Error("Timeout reached while executing.");
> }
>
That's why you are the developer and I am the user ;-)
I am not used to those try..catch constructs, but I am slowly learning.
Thanks for the fix.
---
Stefan
|
|