[sheepdog-users] is --nohalt dangerous?
namei.unix at gmail.com
Wed Jul 18 08:55:37 CEST 2012
On 07/18/2012 02:27 PM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>> We just provide the safest default to run sheep generally and users can
>> specify --nohalt options if he don't need it.
> What do you mean by 'if he don't need it.'? Data consistency is always a requirement (else I would store in RAM).
I mean, users don't need this strict requirement, that we need at least
nodes >= copies to run the cluster.
More information about the sheepdog-users