[sheepdog-users] VDI error messages

Liu Yuan namei.unix at gmail.com
Mon Dec 16 12:04:24 CET 2013


On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:54:31AM +0100, Valerio Pachera wrote:
> When I read something like that, it means vdi(s) got corruped right?
> 
> Dec 16 11:08:16  ALERT [io 22348] get_vdi_copy_policy(117) copy policy for
> 539419 not found, set 0
> Dec 16 11:08:16  ALERT [io 22348] get_vdi_copy_policy(117) copy policy for
> 539419 not found, set 0
> Dec 16 11:08:16  ERROR [io 22236] vid_is_snapshot(74) No VDI entry for
> 539419 found
> Dec 16 11:08:16  ALERT [io 22236] get_vdi_copy_policy(117) copy policy for
> 539419 not found, set 0
> Dec 16 11:08:16  ALERT [io 22236] get_vdi_copy_policy(117) copy policy for
> 539419 not found, set 0
> Dec 16 11:08:16  ERROR [io 22348] vid_is_snapshot(74) No VDI entry for
> 539419 found
> Dec 16 11:08:16  ALERT [io 22348] get_vdi_copy_policy(117) copy policy for
> 539419 not found, set 0
> Dec 16 11:08:16  ALERT [io 22348] get_vdi_copy_policy(117) copy policy for
> 539419 not found, set 0
> Dec 16 11:08:16  ERROR [io 22236] vid_is_snapshot(74) No VDI entry for
> 539419 found
> Dec 16 11:08:16  ALERT [io 22236] get_vdi_copy_policy(117) copy policy for
> 539419 not found, set 0
> Dec 16 11:08:16  ALERT [io 22236] get_vdi_copy_policy(117) copy policy for
> 539419 not found, set 0
> Dec 16 11:49:28  ERROR [net 22234] do_read(220) connection is closed (48
> bytes left)
> Dec 16 11:49:28  ERROR [net 22234] rx_work(611) failed to read a header
> Dec 16 11:49:28  ERROR [net 22294] do_read(220) connection is closed (48
> bytes left)
> Dec 16 11:49:28  ERROR [net 22294] rx_work(611) failed to read a header
> Dec 16 11:49:28  ALERT [gway 22235] get_vdi_copy_policy(117) copy policy
> for 5ddf89 not found, set 0
> Dec 16 11:49:28  ALERT [gway 22235] get_vdi_copy_policy(117) copy policy
> for 5ddf89 not found, set 0
> Dec 16 11:49:28  ALERT [gway 22235] get_vdi_copy_policy(117) copy policy
> for 5ddf89 not found, set 0
> Dec 16 11:49:28  ALERT [gway 22235] get_vdi_copy_policy(117) copy policy
> for 5ddf89 not found, set 0
> Dec 16 11:49:28  ALERT [gway 22235] get_vdi_copy_policy(117) copy policy
> for 5ddf89 not found, set 0
> Dec 16 11:49:29  ALERT [gway 22235] get_vdi_copy_policy(117) copy policy
> for 5ddf89 not found, set 0
> Dec 16 11:49:29  ALERT [gway 22235] get_vdi_copy_policy(117) copy policy
> for 5ddf89 not found, set 0

It depends, but I think in your case, it is okay if you don't erasure code.

Thanks
Yuan



More information about the sheepdog-users mailing list