[sheepdog-users] dog cluster snapshot problems
namei.unix at gmail.com
Fri Aug 8 09:55:30 CEST 2014
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 09:02:13AM +0200, Valerio Pachera wrote:
> 2014-08-07 17:33 GMT+02:00 Andrew J. Hobbs <ajhobbs at desu.edu>:
> > The slowness is an issue for me. In our cluster now, we're already up to
> > the cluster snapshot taking more than six hours to complete, whereas the
> > backup script runs in less than 2 hours for full, or 10 minutes for the
> > incrementals (roughly).
> Thank you very much for sharing your experience!
> > I was originally enchanted by the idea of using cluster snapshot, but
> > we've been through a few cycles with memory leaks
> I remember the memory leack issue but it was long time ago.
> Sure it require more testing.
> I'm curious to hear form the developers if, later on, it will be possible
> to have better performance or there are no chances.
Could you please test origin/devel branch? I think the performence should be
boosted a lot. Our current design should not so lag behind qemu-img convert.
More information about the sheepdog-users