[sheepdog-users] Testing snapshot-object-reclaim

[Hitoshi Mitake]

At Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:34:53 +0900,
Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> 
> At Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:27:50 +0100,
> Valerio Pachera wrote:
> > 
> > [1  <text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)>]
> > 2014-02-26 8:55 GMT+01:00 Hitoshi Mitake <mitake.hitoshi at gmail.com>:
> > > Can I see an output of "tree <path of sheepdog store>" on both of the nodes?
> > 
> > My nodes are using multi disk
> > 
> > root at test004:~# pgrep -lf sheep
> > 11873 sheep -n /var/sheep /mnt/sheep/dsk02 -c
> > zookeeper:192.168.2.44:2181,192.168.2.45:2181,192.168.2.46:2181 -i
> > host=192.168.10.4 port=3333
> > 
> > root at test005:/tmp# pgrep -lf sheep
> > 11573 sheep -n /var/sheep /mnt/sheep/dsk01,/mnt/sheep/dsk02 -c
> > zookeeper:192.168.2.44:2181,192.168.2.45:2181,192.168.2.46:2181 -i
> > host=192.168.10.5 port=3333
> > 
> > 
> > I run tree on all the involved folders.
> > Becasue the lists are very long I'm attaching them as file.
> > Did you need only /var/sheep?
> 
> I found that current patchset treats a ledger object as an erasure
> object. I pushed the new version to the branch, could you test it?

The previous behavior would be able to produce invalid reference
counts like your situation.

Thanks,
Hitoshi