[sheepdog-users] Is qemu faster than sbd?

zhanghongzhou zhang.hongzhou at hotmail.com
Fri Aug 21 02:25:03 CEST 2015


I change ioengine to libaio. Result is better.
randread IOPS: 28681randwrite IOPS: 9564sequential read throughput: 110MB/ssequential write throughput: 37MB/s
From: zhang.hongzhou at hotmail.com
To: sheepdog-users at lists.wpkg.org
Subject: Is qemu faster than sbd?
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:47:22 +0000




Hi experts,
I mounted sbd as ext4 and tested IOPS for 4k rand/seq rw
32 sheep, 3-replica. Backend is ssd.
The result is much slower than testing on bear ssd.randread IOPS: 16732randwrite IOPS: 1436sequential read throughput: 64MB/ssequential write throughput: 6MB/s
I saw some qemu fio test results from COJ2015 presentation, which is much better.
Is my sbd performance result solid? Or maybe it's configuration difference?
B.R.Hongzhou 		 	   		   		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/sheepdog-users/attachments/20150821/4d32ac4e/attachment.html>


More information about the sheepdog-users mailing list