[Sheepdog] Sheepdog performance
haven at thehavennet.org.uk
Tue Apr 5 12:08:27 CEST 2011
I'm seeing higher results with cache=writeback.
A few comparison runs show thats there's a decent bit of variation per run:
writeback: 41.1, 41.2, 39.3, 39.7, 39.1
none: 42.2, 33.3, 35.2, 30.4, 30.6
I know these tests are not very conclusive but I'm not seeing a huge
difference between the two cache modes.
> On 05/04/11 18:55, Chris Webb wrote:
>> -drive file=sheepdog:test,if=ide,index=0
>> I'm only getting around 5MB/s with the same write test.
> Try cache=none in your drive declaration, I noticed similar I/O
> performance even with LVM backed volumes in recent KVM, until I disabled
> the cache.
> sheepdog mailing list
> sheepdog at lists.wpkg.org
More information about the sheepdog