[Sheepdog] [PATCH v4 3/6] fix a bug of copies calculation in delete_one()

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 06:25:46PM +0800, levin li wrote:
> It tries to compare the nr_copies with inode->nr_copies,
> but the inode has just been allocated, the nr_copies may
> be zero or something random

I just saw this one went in.  As per the thread in reply to my version
of that patch I still think we need to do the inode->nr_copies limiting
after the first read.  Did anyone disagree with that rationale?

(Not that it matter in practice as long as inode->nr_copies is
guaranteed to be the same as sys->nr_copies)